Suck On This, Facebook

The Badass Breastfeeder has been banned from Facebook for three days because of her nursing photos.

She’s in good company. Similar photos have caused mothers to be banned before, such as:

A beautiful mom tandem nursing her twins

A toddler having a little looksie

A newborn smiling around her mother’s breast

Know what they don’t consider obscene?

Boobs and Titties

Boobs and Booty

And my personal favorite, Plz Suck My Boobs

I think picture is pretty clear, don’t you? Breasts are not the issue. Sucking on breasts is even fine (332,000 fans can’t be wrong). It’s when babies are at their mother’s breast, and a woman is proud of her body and proud of what she’s doing for herself and her child that people find it objectionable.

Does Facebook allow photos of mothers breastfeeding?
Yes. We agree that breastfeeding is natural and beautiful and we’re glad to know that it’s important for mothers to share their experiences with others on Facebook. The vast majority of these photos are compliant with our policies.

How do these wonderful nursing photos keep getting taken down, while blatantly offensive photos and pages objectifying women are allowed to garner hundreds of thousands of likes? Because Facebook acts off of reports for offensive content. They take down the content automatically or ban the use responsible and then after the three day period, evaluate whether the reports were warranted.

So, what do you say we take some ACTUALLY offensive content down?

To make a report, go to the pages linked above and follow these instructions:

Only pages that get a certain number of reports are taken down. To concentrate our efforts, go to these specific pages and hopefully we’ll show Facebook what breastfeeding moms are made of!

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Angelic Errands to Run

I spent a lovely Saturday (the whole day, away from my squalling, nursing twins) at a conference for maternal health. There we discussed cultural disparities across many different lines–race, social status, income, and education. The issues presented concerned women who were black mothers, poor mothers, minimum wage mothers, undereducated mothers–they concerned Mormon women. The mothers in my community. In my culture. The stereotypical Latter-day Saint mother, with her brilliant teeth and bottle-blonde hair and department store makeup–that’s not me. That’s not my friends. We don’t live Ann Romney’s life. We have two cars that combined are older than our parents. We live in houses that saw better days under President Carter. These are the mothers I see at church. These are the women that live next door to me. We bring each other meals, we share our stories, and we bear one anothers’ burdens. They are my people.

As the presenters spoke, questions were answered, anecdotes were given and I took notes with a fury not seen since my SAT prep days. Some of the pages were stained with tears.

I choked up at the picture of a premature baby on a ventilator with an IV in her precious hand. I stared in disbelief at stories of care providers who were disrespectful and unkind to women simply because they were a different race, spoke a different language–were another kind of person. I bowed my head to hide that I wept when a mental health professional spoke of how a mother could think her baby will be better off without her. When the women we learned from led us in song rich with joy, I cried again. I cried because I felt worthwhile. I felt needed, valued, useful. I felt loved.

How many of our sisters stand in need of such validation? How many will be sitting next to us in church on Sunday, wondering when Heavenly Father will call them to their glorious errand? How many beat their spirits down until it fits into the mold of a Mormon mother? How many will break when they do not fit?

I stayed in the home not because I wanted to or felt it was better for my family, but because the situation I was in made it the only choice I could see. I was nineteen when I became pregnant. I was wed a month before I turned twenty. I dropped out of college, quit my job, and became a housewife. I’ve enjoyed the last five years. I have been reasonably fulfilled in that role. Though more honestly put, I’ve made the most of it.

I have also been desperate. Searching, screaming for a chance to be made good use of, to learn, to be challenged. I have poured over every article, study and book I could get my hands on, devoured every forum and blog I could find. I have more secondhand textbooks than a medical student. I have written more words on birth and breastfeeding and postpartum support than your average pediatrician has even read.

I wanted to be helpful. I wanted to be put to work. I wanted to be needed. I thought the sweat of my brow and the ache of my back could be used for more than washing and folding, sewing and mending, sweeping and scrubbing. I needed my mind and my thoughts to be used for something besides stories and songs, for my time and talents to serve those who needed more than a maid, a driver, a secretary, a complaint line operator. We have the Relief Society and visiting teaching; Young Women’s presidents and Sunday school teachers; Primary pianists and church choristers. We have temple work and service missions. I have happily and joyfully served my family. Still, I crave a broader purpose.

Yet over and over, I hear from my priesthood leaders that my place is in the home. Unless forced by tragic circumstance, my duty to God, the prophet, and my husband is to meet the needs of my family before my own. I have covenanted to have faith. To be obedient. To endure. As a girl, I was to choose the right. As a woman, I am to endure to the end.

What a curious choice of words–endure. Obstacles and struggles are to be overcome. Drudgery is to be endured. Is this how my time in these latter days is to be spent–enduring? Nothing but one difficult day after another, days of rocking and nursing giving way to chases and tantrums, followed by school and homework and cars and college? What is to become of me when my task is done? What am I to do–who am I to be–when mothering no longer consumes my days and my thoughts and my life?

No wonder the childless in our church feel so alone. No wonder the barren feel so hopeless. The only comfort given them is that they will one day be blessed with a family in paradise. But they do not want the bliss of a fantasy. They do not dream of perfect, celestial children. They ache for one heavy in their wombs and in their arms. They think about nurseries and handmade quilts, the sweet-milk smell of a baby’s skin as one sleeps on their chests. The mystical, mythical design of eternal families is one of great meaning, but it brings little joy to a woman who must wait a lifetime to have it.

It is not the road to the kingdom of Heaven that is paved with good intentions. The intention of our beloved leaders is not this. They do not mean to be cruel. They do not want us to feel unvalued and unworthy. They do not wish for their fellow children of God to feel so alone. I learned today that intentions are only as good as they are effective. What women effectively learn in the church is that they are to content themselves with the joy of motherhood.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has something to answer for: they have failed women. They have failed mothers and they have failed daughters, failed our elderly grandmothers and our unmarried aunts. Most of all, they have failed the women who yearn to carry out the errand of angels, as is our sacred charge. Every time a woman hears that service in the home and to the church is the more worthwhile, the unspoken conclusion is that it must come at the price of every other. We are endowed as queens while we beg for the crumbs of ours masters’ tables. The duty of motherhood, held equal to the honor of the priesthood, is not given its proper respect. Our contributions are given second billing to those of every priesthood holder. A boy of twelve is handed the keys to ordinances and given responsibilities denied to the women who birthed his mother, his father, his aunts and uncles and cousins, the righteous women who served their callings honorably and brought up a God-fearing generation. She shepherded them onto the way and through the narrow gate–yet her gifts are seen as lower and less noteworthy.

A pedestal may give you a good view, but it is difficult to do much good from. Until women are encouraged and empowered to do good in their communities, to serve outside of their homes and beyond their callings, they will continue to wonder if this is all the Lord has in store for them and what good will come of their service to Him. We will continue to see our sisters stumble and fall. Shall our church stand idly by as they mourn what could have been?


As sisters in Zion, we’ll all work together
The blessings of God on our labors we’ll seek.
We’ll build up his kingdom with earnest endeavor
We’ll comfort the weary and strengthen the weak.

The errand of angels is given to women
And this is a gift that, as sisters, we claim

To do whatsoever is gentle and human
To cheer and to bless in humanity’s name.

How vast is our purpose, how broad is our mission
If we but fulfill it in spirit and deed.
Oh, naught but the Spirit’s divinest tuition
Can give us the wisdom to truly succeed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 10 Comments

Drying Up: Natural Resources (part 3 of 6)

What is the best resource for nursing mothers?

The lack of support for mothers is more than a breastfeeding issue–it is a societal one. The government initiative “Healthy People 2020” is a list of objectives for public health, which includes breastfeeding goals. The targets include initiation of breastfeeding and increasing the proportion of breastfed infants. Oddly enough they do not include any goals for increasing education and support.

Mother to mother is the traditional method for knowledge to be passed down. Young women were in charge of their younger siblings and cousins and observed their mothers and aunts nursing. By the time she had her own children, she would have years of experience taking care of infants. As the generation gap between mothers and daughters widens and especially since the previous generation breastfed little if at all, this kind of practical experience is hard to come by.

The heyday of formula, from the 1920s through the 80s, was also when birth moved from the home to the hospital and the field of pediatrics grew into a legitimate field of medicine. The advice mothers were given from their doctors flew in the face of what will benefit the exclusively nursing mother and baby. Prior to that, women relied on their own skills and that of their mothers and grandmothers to treat illness in their families. Few people had access to medical care and paying for a doctor’s services for a simple cold or broken bone was unheard of.

Mothers today are attended by an obstetrician or a nurse-midwife based in a hospital. She will give birth and spend the next 48 hours in the hospital’s postpartum wing, attended by nurses. These two days are crucial for reaching breastfeeding goals. Unfortunately, they are also the two days that interference, poor instruction, and discouragement are most common. It is still common advice to only nurse so many minutes on each side, that the baby must take each breast at every feeding, that the baby should learn to suck on a bottle or pacifier in order to nurse, or that the colostrum is of little value and shouldn’t be relied upon to nourish the baby until the mature milk comes in–the myths are endless. All have been proven through peer-reviewed research to interfere with both initiation in the hospital and the success rates of reaching even six weeks of breastfeeding.
The reason these doctors fail to provide evidence-based care is that they have little reason to. If the shortcomings of bottle-feeding are overlooked in the name of not judging parents, they are then coached as benefits of breastfeeding as opposed to risks of formula. This provides little motivation to learn about the complex issues that crop up when attending to nursing mothers and their breastfed babies.

If the mother does make it out of the hospital nursing, the next healthcare provider she will see is her child’s doctor. However, most pediatricians lack the education to understand the development of an exclusively breastfed baby. Medical schools do not consider the science of breastfeeding to be worth including in their vast curricula. Interns learn from residents, residents learn from attendings, attendings learn from fellows–and they learn in hospitals. Once they have completed their training, they go on to become general practitioners, family doctors, obstetricians, and pediatricians. It is then and only then that they will have direct contact with a mother who is breastfeeding her child in the course of everyday life, where they often find it lacking in comparison. Formula is an adequate form of nutrition and is now the standard to which breastfeeding is held. Weaning is seen as the cure-all for any and every issue. It must be as easy, as simple, as effortless as bottle feeding, because if it’s not, then why bother at all?

The things people will not blame breastfeeding for is a short list. Doctors look at a one- or two-year old-who is still nursing and think that must be why the child is so clingy, or not sleeping well, or developing cavities, or not speaking perfectly. They hear from a mother with nipple pain and wonder why they should investigate further if it’s such a problem. They see a normally developing infant and wonder why the mother continues to breastfeed if it is still causing her problems. They see children in the emergency room with dehydration from an illness and blame insufficient milk instead of diarrhea and vomiting. They give advice that further restricts the baby’s milk intake and then conclude the milk supply was too low in the first place.

With the lack of generational knowledge and minimal support from her healthcare providers, where is the nursing mother to turn?

The best source of education, treatment, and support is an international board certified lactation consultant (IBCLC). It is quite a high bar for the aspiring lactation professional. The Board has the most stringent requirements and accepts only those who are truly dedicated to helping women and children. Unlike other healthcare professionals, IBCLCs must recertify every five years with continuing education credits, and every ten years by exam. This ensures that every IBCLC is up to date on the latest in evidence-based practice. To claim the title is an accomplishment that has long gone unrecognized. To become an IBCLC requires ninety hours of lactation education and one thousand hours of supervised clinical experience, as well as college courses in biology, health science technology, and psychology.

Part of the reason why there is a need for such a clunky string of letters is because the title of “lactation consultant” is unregulated. Anyone with an opinion and a nipple shield can put a sign on their door and make some business cards with the letters “LC” after their name. While there are many certification programs to become a certified lactation or certified breastfeeding counselor, they can vary greatly in their scope and rigor.

So why don’t women seek out the aid and advice of the professional IBCLC? The three biggest reasons are money, time, and accessibility. Raising a child is expensive, and formula is seen as part and parcel of that. Even though a single consultation might cost a mother more upfront, it will be far less expensive than the ongoing costs of formula feeding.

The most challenging time for any new parent is the first six weeks. Mothers are healing physically and emotionally, fathers are adjusting to their new roles, and siblings are vying for attention with the new noisemaker in the house. Simply running to the store, making dinner, and cleaning the kitchen is borderline impossible in the wake of a new baby. Women cannot be expected to identify breastfeeding problems, troubleshoot possible solutions, and then implement them on their own. They need more help at each step along the way if they are to succeed.

Yet the reason that IBCLCs aren’t used more is also the easiest to change: mothers can’t find them when they need them. They don’t know who they are, where they’re located or how to contact them. They worry about sounding silly or stupid if they call about a problem, thinking that if other women know how to breastfeed, why is it so hard for them? Why can’t they figure it out? Trying to get out of the house is a hassle in and of itself, let alone in time to make it to an appointment in between their postpartum checkups and the baby’s visits.

The lack of support for mothers extends to many more areas of life than just breastfeeding. If a woman has a solid social network of friends and family, as well as professionals, she is at lower risk for postpartum mood disorders and her children will benefit as well. If we are to set public health goals for breastfeeding, we must raise the bar for healthcare professionals as well.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

GUEST POST: No Pay, No Value

Kaylie Brown Astin is the owner and founder of Family Friendly Work and helps to identify flexible work solutions..

One of the downfalls of living in a capitalistic world is that when commodities have a value attached to them, often the market undervalues or overvalues things. This is often true of work that has traditionally been the territory of women.

Women have often done their work for free or for very little pay. Because the market doesn’t assign child care, housework, or early childhood education a high value, it isn’t a stretch for some to assume it isn’t valuable. Many people, if they feel they aren’t being adequately compensated, will quit their jobs rather than suffer the indignity of having others undervalue their work.

But even though the public, from the highly compensated critic next door to the Gross Domestic Product (which doesn’t count domestic duties in its calculations), places no value on work done outside the labor force, some forms of compensation matter more than wages.
This isn’t to say that stay-at-home parents should never get paid, ever, for fear of undermining parents’ motivation. This is only meant to explain why so many people continue to work for little or no pay, often for years at a time. Something besides money is motivating them.
Money can be a powerful motivator. And it’s nice to know that someone sees the importance of your work enough to incur a cost to them.

Besides my work as a parent, I do a lot of volunteer work. I’m the first to admit rarely getting paid can be discouraging. After a while, if I’m not careful, I could lose confidence and start to think that no one values my work enough to pay me. This simply isn’t true—I make choices that allow me to pursue my interests and create a balance that works for me. While it’s true I wouldn’t mind a few more dollars in the bank account, most employers would demand more time than I’m willing to give right now.

Some suggest that if you’re working for free, you’re undervaluing yourself. After all, I worked just as hard to get my education, skills, and experience as the next guy. If I’m giving away my work because I think I’m supposed to be nice, there might be a problem.
But I’m not just exercising my womanly kindness here, and I doubt most parents took on child-raising purely out of the goodness of their hearts. Some parents volunteer for their school’s parent-teacher association because they know parent participation is vital to improving the school their child attends. Some parents see a need in the community and spearhead movements to help things improve simply because they’re thinking about their place as a citizen in the world. Some volunteer as a way of developing skills and experience to be used in future employment. Others have children with extra needs, and they feel that they are better able than anyone else to help their children succeed. For me, making a difference matters. I know myself well enough to understand that if I’m not improving the condition of people around me, I’m not going to be happy.

People who are paid for their work help people, too, but the problem I see is this: when the market doesn’t value those who can’t or don’t make money, this creates huge holes. Many people will be overlooked, especially those whose money-making skills aren’t up to par: children, the disabled, or people from disadvantaged populations, for example. Some can become productive members of society, but they need help to get there. And that’s one of the biggest gaps that unpaid work fills.

Our economy depends on this work. While I can hear some say, “Yes, people used to say the same about slavery,” it’s not the same. A slave has little choice about his or her circumstance, and is subservient to the household. His or her options are limited to improving the household, but rarely can the slave hope to make a difference in society or to improve conditions for anyone else.
I’m not saying money doesn’t matter. We all need it. But it doesn’t create happiness, and while not everyone is able to forego the income or the time in order to do so, those who have the opportunity to stay home with their kids or volunteer their time often give to others without financial reward.
By doing the work that they do, parents and volunteers make major contributions to the economy. They improve the lives of people around them. It’s the times tables memorized over the kitchen table and the hopeful word shared with a homeless person that creates the future business launch or the next non-profit organization.

We don’t value those contributions because we don’t measure them in dollars.
But maybe we should start.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Drying Up: Breastfeeding as the Biological Norm (part 2 of 6)

Humans are complicated creatures. We are unique in several ways from our primate kin and other mammals. Even from our own foremothers, women today have challenges and limitations that have proven difficult to overcome. Natural does not mean simple, and simple does not mean easy.

The process of lactation begins as soon as a mother is pregnant. The first stage is the laying down of new mammary tissue in preparation for the initial milk supply–the first milk called “colostrum”. It differs from mature milk in both form and function. Colostrum is denser in calories, higher in protein, and contains different antibodies than mature milk. It is thicker in consistency and is a golden yellow color. Once the baby is born, the placenta detaching causes a drop in progesterone, which triggers the switch from colostrum to mature milk. This hormone-driven shift takes place over the course of several days and is commonly known as your milk “coming in”. While many mothers experience engorgement or leaking, it is also within the realm of normal to have no noticeable swelling or growth after the birth. It is not indicative of insufficient supply.

The initial twenty-four hours after the birth are crucial in establishing the nursing relationship. Birth is exhausting for both mother and baby, and there is a brief window of alertness where a newborn will most easily accept the breast and latch well. The World Health Organization encourages immediate skin to skin contact with initiation of breastfeeding in the first hour after birth. The current practice in some hospitals of otherwise healthy infants being observed as they transition to the outside world is disruptive to this process and ultimately unnecessary. Skin to skin care, where the baby can hear the same heartbeat, the same rhythm of the mother’s breaths, and hear her voice, provides a more gentle transition to life outside the womb.

A main component into why the first days of life are so important, and a large part of why the first three months of parenthood can be so difficult, is how underdeveloped human infants are at birth. Compared to other species, we take an inordinate amount of time to mobilize, eat solid foods, and reach full physical development.

One of the more significant differences that play into this is the human pelvis. Not only is the shape narrowed by function of being bipedal, the structure of the muscles, ligaments, and tendons are fundamentally different from those of other mammals. The restrictions that the medical model of childbirth place on mothers further complicate the process of birth and breastfeeding. The large cranium that houses our unique brains is the reason humans are born so underdeveloped, and that presents some complications when it comes to feeding. The digestive tract in particular is slow to mature, and is susceptible to inflammation and infection. One of the gravest risks presented by artificial milk substitutes or fortifiers is to premature infants, who face enormous challenges already. The most common cause of death in this population is necrotizing enterocolitis. The proteins of cow’s milk differ vastly from those in human milk, and the composition of fats and sugars as well. Combined with the non-sterile nature of powdered formula, these factors comprise the main factors of risk for the underdeveloped human infant.

Another biological fact of breastfeeding is the different ratios of fats to proteins to carbohydrates in mammalian milk. There are cache mammals, such as deer and rabbits, where the mother feeds her young intermittently throughout the day. These mammals’ milk have the highest ratio of proteins and fat, to help sustain them until their next feeding. Nest mammals are those that “den” and their young have a short period of helplessness, such as the dog and cat. Their eyes are born shut and they have limited ability to move, and dependent on their mothers’ warmth, need her constant presence. Their milk is higher in carbohydrates, as the more frequent feeds than cache mammals provide more nutrients.

Next are follow mammals, such as the horse and cow, who walk shortly after birth and can eat frequently at their mothers’ sides. Their milk is lower in fat and protein than cache mammals, but higher than those of other species (in order to provide the energy and build the muscles these animals need to develop quickly).

Finally, there are carry mammals, such as primates and marsupials. The infants of these species are the most helpless, for the longest period of time, and feed the most frequently. It is normal for a newborn baby to nurse almost around the clock and to stay constantly at their mother’s side. Carry mammal milk is the highest in carbohydrates, as the large brains of primates require large amounts of sugars to grow and function.

Modern life proves to be the biggest challenge to a successful nursing relationship. Mothers are more alone now than ever, as families are smaller and more distant from one another. The life of a woman when there were grandmothers, aunts, cousins, and sisters to help maintain the household while a new mother recovered is very different from the experiences of women today. Especially compared to having a network of local friends and family, women must go outside for social interaction. The only avenues to connect are through mothering groups, activities for their children, or their churches. Even with a successful start to breastfeeding in the hospital, in-person support is crucial to the breastfeeding relationship. Ultimately, if the challenges of modern life are managed and mothers receive the support they need, they can more successfully reach their goals.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Lactivist Calling

Lactivism: the radical notion that breastfeeding is normal

Lactivists want to put themselves out of work. They want to stop fighting restaurants and schools and yes, churches, that interfere with nursing their babies.There is an obvious difference between urination, defecation, and drinking milk. It is shameful that we have put the milk made for our babies to the same level as bodily waste. It is far from it as you could get. A mother who nurses her baby in public is spreading far fewer germs than someone who uses the restroom without washing their hands. Breastmilk is sterile and, due to the amazing properties it possesses, stays good at room temperature for up to eight hours. Try that with a glass of cow’s milk and get back to me.

Every lactivist is different and has a different goal in mind when she calls herself that. For some, it’s nursing in public. For others, it’s equality in the workplace, with fair employment laws that allow mothers to pump for their children. Medication safety and access is another worthwhile cause for lactivists. How current childbirth practices affect infant feeding, and what role doctors play in low breastfeeding rates. As a result, lactivists explore their own cultures and taboos. There is a wealth of information as to how infant formula became the standard of care and breastmilk is the free gift with purchase. To learn about these issues and the problems behind them is to question the way we treat women and children.

You cannot exclude children without excluding their mothers. The more family-friendly something is, the more woman-friendly it is. The social costs of raising a child are enormous. For many women, it pulls them out of their careers or stalls their education. Even mothers who are married or in stable relationships do most of the parenting tasks. Others will remark if she gets a rare night to herself that the father is “babysitting,” as though he’s unpaid help for which the mother should be grateful, as opposed to fulfilling his role as a father.

We do not value motherhood in this society. We overlook the costs and time a mother puts into her family as “housework.” We dismiss the hours of labor that go into bringing up a child to be a productive, useful, and respectable member of society. The small ways a mother in the home can reach out and enrich herself are looked down upon. It is shameful that our church has become yet another place this inequality is perpetuated. The words of General Authorities praising motherhood mean nothing if they are not practiced. To judge a mother for breastfeeding reduces those words to mere niceties.

Why is the issue of lactivism so important for the Latter-day Saint woman?

Our Heavenly Father made the mother’s body so it could produce milk. This milk is made especially for human babies to drink. It is better for babies than milk from animals.

The Latter-day Saint Woman: Basic Manual for Women, “Lesson 23: Nutrition for Mother and Baby”.

LDS women are called to be mothers. We are instructed from a young age that it is the highest calling we will ever have. To bring life into the world, to nourish and cherish that life is the most sacred act of love. We ask mothers to put aside their desires for employment, for education, for the niceties and necessities provided by a second income so that she may fully devote herself to her children.

If the church can can ask this of us why can we not ask our brothers and sisters to support us in whatever way they can? It takes no time to smile at a nursing mother. It takes very little to sit beside her and ask how her baby is growing. And it takes even less of your time not to go and complain to a bishop about it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Drying Up: How Breastfeeding Fails (part 1 of 6)


The series Drying Up: How Breastfeeding Fails addresses the complex issues of breastfeeding and why women struggle to meet their own goals. Posts will cover personal choice, bodily autonomy, the role of the medical community, informed consent, and how to make resources more available to those who in need.

The Blame Game
by Katherine Anderson

It is time to stop lying to ourselves. Women have not failed to breastfeed. We have failed to help them do so. We do not support them by judging them or their choices. We support them by listening to their stories, and providing empathy as well as information.

It is time to place the blame where it belongs, and that place can no longer be on women who just want to feed their babies. It needs to be on those who have failed to support them. It needs to be on the formula companies that undermine them, the doctors that do not educate them, and the culture that does not accept them.

The reasons why women do not succeed in meeting their own goals for breastfeeding are multifaceted. The frustrations of caring for a new baby combined with the stress of sleep deprivation and conflicting opinions and advice, can quickly send a vulnerable mother into a tailspin of guilt and shame. There are plenty of reasons that it doesn’t work out, and we can pin it on any number of issues. Slow weight gain. Oversupply. Undersupply. Poor latching. Pain. You could blame doctors, lactation consultants, nurses, formula handouts, pharmaceutical companies. There’s plenty of it to go around. Except it doesn’t. The blame falls on mothers. We take a mother who is trying to do the most basic parenting task, and we tell her she’s not good enough. And she believes it.

Most of all, women blame themselves. They blame their bodies. They’re judged for trying too hard, and then shamed for not trying hard enough. There is criticism everywhere they turn.

We cannot afford to waste time quibbling over how mothers should try harder or blaming them for not doing all this work themselves. $13 billion dollars and over 900 infants a year in the United States of America could be saved if they were not formula-fed.
This is to say nothing of the 1.3 million infant lives could be saved this year if the UNICEF and World Health Organization guidelines were followed.

We must separate the issues of bottle-feeding as a parenting choice, and infant formula as a chemical substance. We must validate the choices parents make for their children while also being free to expose the risks lack of breastfeeding support presents to women and children.

To claim that you cannot criticize formula without judging the mothers who use it is disingenuous. Science says that the consumption of saturated fats leads to an increase in cardiovascular health risks. Science says that a sedentary lifestyle leads to an increased risk of high blood pressure. Those claims are backed by research and are not criticisms. What’s more important is what they do not say: that those who eat fast food are bad, or that those who don’t exercise are lazy.

Informed consent is the foundation of patient advocacy, and you cannot be informed if you are not aware of the facts. Parents have the right to the latest research and practices when it comes to infant feeding. They have the same right as a man does when he goes to a doctor for his erectile dysfunction, as a woman has when she needs labwork to test for a disease, as an athlete who sustains an injury. The risks presented by formula should not be brushed under the “mommy war” rug.

The slogan “Breast is Best” ignores what is best for the mother. Breastmilk is best for babies, of that there is no doubt. So what is best for mothers? Encouragement. Validation. Respect. They need education that is not admonishment, and advice that is not belittling. They need friends and family members who will accept the choices they make.

“Why do you care if a mother breastfeeds or not?”

Isn’t that reason enough?

Katherine Anderson is the mother of three children, a birth and breastfeeding counselor, and aspiring IBCLC. Passionate about lactivism, environmental causes and other endeavors, she enjoys writing, horseback riding, and dedicating her talents to support mothers in the community.

She is currently available by email for breastfeeding or birth related consultations. To contact, please email naturalbeginningsutah@gmail.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment